It would seem having a gay organization table next to a United States
Army table would be a
manifestation of the ideals of diversity that Stony Brook touts.
One might assume that these two
organizations, while perhaps not necessarily liking what the other
stood for, would at least be outwardly
respectful toward each other.
If true, what makes this incident even more reprehensible is that the
student was making the allegations
alone. Consequently, he would have no means of defending himself
against a bunch of burly Army guys,
making the University more akin to a high school locker room than an
institution of higher learning. It is
shocking and appalling to think that an adult might resort to such
chicanery in order to impose his bigoted
beliefs on another individual.
Organizations are given the right to table in public areas on campus
to make their presence known and to
attract new students. That an off-campus organization, like the
Army is allowed to set up shop here is a
privilege that they should take seriously. If they saw fit to
bestow their narrow-minded rhetoric at a place
that’s supposed to be an open-minded as Stony Brook, it is a serious
offense that can not be overlooked.
The Army has been temporarily banned from tabling in the Union until
they complete their own
investigation of the matter. If the allegations against them
prove to be substantiated, the Army, or at least
the particular branch that the guilty party comes from, should be banned
from campus permanently. If the
Administration believes that these allegations are true, they must
take a definitive stand. They have to
send a clear message that bigotry against ANYONE, regardless of their
lifestyle choices, will not be
tolerated on this campus. Stony Brook must protect the rights of the
“diverse” student body that it claims
to be so proud of.